It's odd really, but I'd never given a lot of thought to the role of the Leader. After all, they're the Leader, right?
One of the candidates for Party President is emphasising the words at the beginning of Article 20 of the Federal Constitution:
The President shall be the principal public representative of the Party...
and, of course, Liz Webster is absolutely right to point that out. But what, exactly, being the principal public representative of the Party means in reality is rather less clearcut.
I thought, therefore, that I ought to see what it says about the role of the Leader. And that was something of a revelation. Article 18, which refers to the Leader, tells you how one is elected but doesn't actually tell you what the Leader does.
Now I hear you exclaim, "but it's obvious, the Leader leads, right?". Well, yes, but what does that mean, especially if you have a President who wants to be front and centre, as Liz does.
In truth, I've always seen the President as being the principal public representative of the voluntary Party. The idea being that the President is the bridge between the members and the Leader and Parliamentary Parties, conveying hard messages in private and being supportive in public. By chairing the Federal Board, the President manages the voluntary Party and guides the professional team.
At the moment, I don't entirely get the impression that Liz entirely agrees with me and, of course, voters may agree with her. But, at the moment, there are a lot of assertions and little in the way of actual proposals for action. And, as I noted on Saturday, slogans may not get you very far when, in early January, you turn up for your first Board meeting...
3 comments:
Isn't a leader the person who leads us where we want to go?
You'd think so, wouldn't you, Frank. But what if someone else, with an equivalent mandate, wants to?
Really good blog.
Post a Comment